The Atlantic Texas A&M’s decision to censor Plato is “absurd and sinister,” Adam Kirsch writes. But “it is ironically fitting that Plato, of all philosophers, should be targeted by a regime worried about the effect of subversive ideas on tender minds”:
Texas A&M’s decision to censor Plato is “absurd and sinister,” Adam Kirsch writes. But “it is ironically fitting that Plato, of all philosophers, should be targeted by a regime worried about the effect of subversive ideas on tender minds”: