Collector
PCP Issues Final Decision on 6-Month Suspension of Leachon for Ethical Violations | Collector
PCP Issues Final Decision on 6-Month Suspension of Leachon for Ethical Violations
The Manila Times

PCP Issues Final Decision on 6-Month Suspension of Leachon for Ethical Violations

​THE Philippine College of Physicians (PCP) said Friday its decision to suspend health reform advocate Dr. Tony Leachon for six months for serious ethical violations is final and executory. ​The suspension bars Leachon from exercising the privileges of PCP membership for six months. ​The PCP added that its decision was made through a fair and impartial process, following allegations that Leachon issued defamatory and unethical public statements against fellow doctors. ​”The decision was made independently and in accordance with the PCP’s mandate to uphold the ethical and professional standards expected of its members,” the PCP said. ​The board ruled that Leachon’s actions constituted a “serious offense” under the PCP Code of Ethics. ​”Respondent Dr. Leachon committed a clear violation of his duties and responsibilities under the PCP Code of Ethics when he made certain public statements against herein Complainant Dr. Hartigan-Go and engaged in defamatory allegations and insinuations or claims of corruption and unethical practice against his colleagues in a public and official forum,” the board said in a statement. ​The board rejected Leachon’s defense that his statements were protected under free speech, emphasizing that professional criticism has limits, particularly when it harms reputations within the medical community. ​”Constructive criticism is allowed, but it does not grant an unbridled license or blanket authority to defame, discredit, disparage or dishonor persons,” the board added. ​The PCP added that it respects the decision of its members to seek legal remedies regarding the suspension. ​”As an institution, the PCP does not participate in political debates nor does it take positions on pending legal controversies beyond its mandate as a professional organization,” it said. ​ ​In a Facebook post, Leachon expressed disappointment over the suspension, noting his actions were part of his advocacy for public health reform. ​”That same institution has chosen to penalize me — not for wrongdoing, but for fighting for a higher goal, for standing on ethical ground,” Leachon said. ​”What is ethical? Is it defending the victims of negligence and corruption, or is it complicity in the commission of a crime by remaining silent?” he added. ​Leachon noted that the public announcement came as a surprise, revealing that he was given two weeks to appeal, but the suspension was already made public. ​”My hope is simply that any penalty be fair, measured and proportionate, and that due process is observed in both spirit and practice,” he said.

Go to News Site